Dynamic

SQLite vs MySQL

The database that lives in your pocket meets the reliable old workhorse of databases—it's not flashy, but it gets the job done without drama. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

SQLite

The database that lives in your pocket. Zero servers, zero excuses.

SQLite

Nice Pick

The database that lives in your pocket. Zero servers, zero excuses.

Pros

  • +Zero-configuration setup - just drop a file and go
  • +Serverless architecture eliminates deployment headaches
  • +ACID compliance ensures data integrity without the bloat
  • +Widely supported across platforms and languages

Cons

  • -Not built for high-concurrency write-heavy workloads
  • -Limited scalability compared to client-server databases

MySQL

The reliable old workhorse of databases—it's not flashy, but it gets the job done without drama.

Pros

  • +Widely supported with extensive documentation and community
  • +Excellent performance for read-heavy workloads
  • +Easy to set up and manage with tools like phpMyAdmin

Cons

  • -Lacks some advanced features found in PostgreSQL
  • -Can struggle with complex queries and high concurrency

The Verdict

Use SQLite if: You want zero-configuration setup - just drop a file and go and can live with not built for high-concurrency write-heavy workloads.

Use MySQL if: You prioritize widely supported with extensive documentation and community over what SQLite offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
SQLite wins

The database that lives in your pocket. Zero servers, zero excuses.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev