Dynamic

SQLite vs PostgreSQL

The database that lives in your pocket meets the database that actually respects your data, with more features than you'll ever need but you'll love having them anyway. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

SQLite

The database that lives in your pocket. Zero servers, zero excuses.

SQLite

Nice Pick

The database that lives in your pocket. Zero servers, zero excuses.

Pros

  • +Zero-configuration setup - just drop a file and go
  • +Serverless architecture eliminates deployment headaches
  • +ACID compliance ensures data integrity without the bloat
  • +Widely supported across platforms and languages

Cons

  • -Not built for high-concurrency write-heavy workloads
  • -Limited scalability compared to client-server databases

PostgreSQL

The database that actually respects your data, with more features than you'll ever need but you'll love having them anyway.

Pros

  • +Rock-solid ACID compliance and transactional integrity
  • +Rich set of built-in data types including JSON, arrays, and custom types
  • +Excellent performance with advanced indexing options like GIN and GiST
  • +Strong community support and extensive documentation

Cons

  • -Configuration can be complex and overwhelming for beginners
  • -Memory usage tends to be higher compared to some other databases

The Verdict

Use SQLite if: You want zero-configuration setup - just drop a file and go and can live with not built for high-concurrency write-heavy workloads.

Use PostgreSQL if: You prioritize rock-solid acid compliance and transactional integrity over what SQLite offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
SQLite wins

The database that lives in your pocket. Zero servers, zero excuses.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev