Static Application Security Testing vs Software Composition Analysis

Developers should use SAST to proactively identify and fix security vulnerabilities during the development phase, reducing the cost and risk of late-stage remediation meets developers should use sca when building applications with open-source libraries to proactively identify security vulnerabilities (e. Here's our take.

Static Application Security Testing

Nice Pick

Developers should use SAST to proactively identify and fix security vulnerabilities during the development phase, reducing the cost and risk of late-stage remediation

Pros

• It is essential for compliance with security standards (e
• Related to: dynamic-application-security-testing, software-security

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Software Composition Analysis

Developers should use SCA when building applications with open-source libraries to proactively identify security vulnerabilities (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: dependency-management, vulnerability-assessment

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Static Application Security Testing if: You want it is essential for compliance with security standards (e and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Software Composition Analysis if: You prioritize g over what Static Application Security Testing offers.

The Bottom Line

Static Application Security Testing wins

Developers should use SAST to proactively identify and fix security vulnerabilities during the development phase, reducing the cost and risk of late-stage remediation