Static Site Generator vs Single Page Applications

Developers should use static site generators when building content-focused websites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, or marketing pages where content changes infrequently and performance is critical meets developers should learn spas when building modern, interactive web applications that require fast, seamless user experiences, such as dashboards, social media platforms, or productivity tools. Here's our take.

Static Site Generator

Nice Pick

Developers should use static site generators when building content-focused websites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, or marketing pages where content changes infrequently and performance is critical

Pros

• They are ideal for projects requiring fast load times, high security (no server-side vulnerabilities), and low hosting costs, as they generate pre-built files that can be served directly
• Related to: markdown, git

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Single Page Applications

Developers should learn SPAs when building modern, interactive web applications that require fast, seamless user experiences, such as dashboards, social media platforms, or productivity tools

Pros

• They are ideal for applications where frequent user interactions and real-time updates are needed, as they reduce server load and improve perceived performance by minimizing page refreshes
• Related to: javascript, react

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Static Site Generator is a tool while Single Page Applications is a concept. We picked Static Site Generator based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Static Site Generator wins

Based on overall popularity. Static Site Generator is more widely used, but Single Page Applications excels in its own space.