Static Generation vs Server Side Rendering

Developers should use Static Generation when building websites with predictable, infrequently updated content, as it provides superior performance, security, and scalability compared to server-side rendering meets developers should use ssr when building applications that require fast initial page loads, improved seo for search engine crawlers, or better performance on low-powered devices. Here's our take.

Static Generation

Nice Pick

Developers should use Static Generation when building websites with predictable, infrequently updated content, as it provides superior performance, security, and scalability compared to server-side rendering

Pros

• It is ideal for blogs, documentation sites, and e-commerce product pages where SEO and fast load times are critical
• Related to: next-js, gatsby

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Server Side Rendering

Developers should use SSR when building applications that require fast initial page loads, improved SEO for search engine crawlers, or better performance on low-powered devices

Pros

• It's particularly useful for content-heavy websites like blogs, e-commerce platforms, and news sites where first contentful paint is critical
• Related to: next-js, nuxt-js

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Static Generation is a methodology while Server Side Rendering is a concept. We picked Static Generation based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Static Generation wins

Based on overall popularity. Static Generation is more widely used, but Server Side Rendering excels in its own space.