Static HTML vs Server Side Rendering

Developers should learn and use Static HTML for building simple, high-performance websites where content rarely changes, such as portfolios, blogs, or marketing pages, as it reduces server load and improves load times meets developers should use ssr when building applications that require fast initial page loads, improved seo for search engine crawlers, or better performance on low-powered devices. Here's our take.

Static HTML

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Static HTML for building simple, high-performance websites where content rarely changes, such as portfolios, blogs, or marketing pages, as it reduces server load and improves load times

Pros

• It is essential for front-end web development, serving as the base for more complex frameworks and tools, and is crucial for SEO optimization and accessibility compliance in web projects
• Related to: css, javascript

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Server Side Rendering

Developers should use SSR when building applications that require fast initial page loads, improved SEO for search engine crawlers, or better performance on low-powered devices

Pros

• It's particularly useful for content-heavy websites like blogs, e-commerce platforms, and news sites where first contentful paint is critical
• Related to: next-js, nuxt-js

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Static HTML is a language while Server Side Rendering is a concept. We picked Static HTML based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Static HTML wins

Based on overall popularity. Static HTML is more widely used, but Server Side Rendering excels in its own space.