Dynamic

Static Imports vs CommonJS

Developers should use static imports to write cleaner, more maintainable code by reducing namespace clutter and making dependencies explicit, which is especially beneficial in large projects with many modules meets developers should learn commonjs when working with node. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Static Imports

Developers should use static imports to write cleaner, more maintainable code by reducing namespace clutter and making dependencies explicit, which is especially beneficial in large projects with many modules

Static Imports

Nice Pick

Developers should use static imports to write cleaner, more maintainable code by reducing namespace clutter and making dependencies explicit, which is especially beneficial in large projects with many modules

Pros

  • +They are ideal for frequently used functions or classes from external libraries, such as importing 'useState' from React in JavaScript or 'List' from 'java
  • +Related to: es6-modules, javascript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

CommonJS

Developers should learn CommonJS when working with Node

Pros

  • +js or older JavaScript projects, as it was the default module system in Node
  • +Related to: node-js, javascript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Static Imports if: You want they are ideal for frequently used functions or classes from external libraries, such as importing 'usestate' from react in javascript or 'list' from 'java and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use CommonJS if: You prioritize js or older javascript projects, as it was the default module system in node over what Static Imports offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Static Imports wins

Developers should use static imports to write cleaner, more maintainable code by reducing namespace clutter and making dependencies explicit, which is especially beneficial in large projects with many modules

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev