Static Site Generator vs Dynamic CMS

Developers should use Static Site Generators when building content-focused websites that require high performance, security, and low maintenance, as they eliminate server-side vulnerabilities and reduce hosting costs meets developers should learn dynamic cms when building content-heavy websites that require frequent updates, such as blogs, news portals, or corporate sites, as it streamlines content creation and reduces development time. Here's our take.

Static Site Generator

Nice Pick

Developers should use Static Site Generators when building content-focused websites that require high performance, security, and low maintenance, as they eliminate server-side vulnerabilities and reduce hosting costs

Pros

• They are ideal for projects with infrequent content updates, such as blogs or documentation, where the speed of static files outweighs the need for dynamic server rendering
• Related to: markdown, git

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Dynamic CMS

Developers should learn Dynamic CMS when building content-heavy websites that require frequent updates, such as blogs, news portals, or corporate sites, as it streamlines content creation and reduces development time

Pros

• It's also valuable for projects where non-technical users need to manage content independently, enhancing collaboration and scalability
• Related to: wordpress, drupal

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Static Site Generator is a tool while Dynamic CMS is a platform. We picked Static Site Generator based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Static Site Generator wins

Based on overall popularity. Static Site Generator is more widely used, but Dynamic CMS excels in its own space.