Dynamic

Static Typing vs Duck Typing

Developers should use static typing in projects requiring high reliability, maintainability, and performance, such as large-scale enterprise applications, systems programming, or safety-critical software meets developers should learn duck typing when working in dynamically-typed languages to write more generic and reusable code that focuses on what objects can do rather than what they are. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Static Typing

Developers should use static typing in projects requiring high reliability, maintainability, and performance, such as large-scale enterprise applications, systems programming, or safety-critical software

Static Typing

Nice Pick

Developers should use static typing in projects requiring high reliability, maintainability, and performance, such as large-scale enterprise applications, systems programming, or safety-critical software

Pros

  • +It helps prevent type-related bugs, improves code documentation through explicit type annotations, and enables better tooling support like autocompletion and refactoring in IDEs
  • +Related to: type-systems, compiler-design

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Duck Typing

Developers should learn duck typing when working in dynamically-typed languages to write more generic and reusable code that focuses on what objects can do rather than what they are

Pros

  • +It's particularly useful for creating flexible APIs, implementing design patterns like strategy or adapter, and handling diverse data structures in a uniform way, such as iterating over collections regardless of their specific type
  • +Related to: dynamic-typing, polymorphism

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Static Typing if: You want it helps prevent type-related bugs, improves code documentation through explicit type annotations, and enables better tooling support like autocompletion and refactoring in ides and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Duck Typing if: You prioritize it's particularly useful for creating flexible apis, implementing design patterns like strategy or adapter, and handling diverse data structures in a uniform way, such as iterating over collections regardless of their specific type over what Static Typing offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Static Typing wins

Developers should use static typing in projects requiring high reliability, maintainability, and performance, such as large-scale enterprise applications, systems programming, or safety-critical software

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev