Static Web Pages vs Server Side Rendering

Developers should use static web pages for projects where performance, simplicity, and low maintenance are priorities, such as blogs, landing pages, or small business websites meets developers should use ssr when building applications that require fast initial page loads, improved seo for search engine crawlers, or better performance on low-powered devices. Here's our take.

Static Web Pages

Nice Pick

Developers should use static web pages for projects where performance, simplicity, and low maintenance are priorities, such as blogs, landing pages, or small business websites

Pros

• They are cost-effective due to minimal server requirements and enhance security by reducing attack surfaces compared to dynamic sites
• Related to: html, css

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Server Side Rendering

Developers should use SSR when building applications that require fast initial page loads, improved SEO for search engine crawlers, or better performance on low-powered devices

Pros

• It's particularly useful for content-heavy websites like blogs, e-commerce platforms, and news sites where first contentful paint is critical
• Related to: next-js, nuxt-js

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Static Web Pages if: You want they are cost-effective due to minimal server requirements and enhance security by reducing attack surfaces compared to dynamic sites and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Server Side Rendering if: You prioritize it's particularly useful for content-heavy websites like blogs, e-commerce platforms, and news sites where first contentful paint is critical over what Static Web Pages offers.

The Bottom Line

Static Web Pages wins

Developers should use static web pages for projects where performance, simplicity, and low maintenance are priorities, such as blogs, landing pages, or small business websites