Static Web vs Server Side Rendering

Developers should use static web approaches for content-heavy sites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing pages where content changes infrequently meets developers should use ssr when building applications that require fast initial page loads, improved seo for search engine crawlers, or better performance on low-powered devices. Here's our take.

Static Web

Nice Pick

Developers should use static web approaches for content-heavy sites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing pages where content changes infrequently

Pros

• It's ideal for projects requiring fast load times, low hosting costs, and enhanced security since there's no server-side code execution
• Related to: html, css

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Server Side Rendering

Developers should use SSR when building applications that require fast initial page loads, improved SEO for search engine crawlers, or better performance on low-powered devices

Pros

• It's particularly useful for content-heavy websites like blogs, e-commerce platforms, and news sites where first contentful paint is critical
• Related to: next-js, nuxt-js

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Static Web if: You want it's ideal for projects requiring fast load times, low hosting costs, and enhanced security since there's no server-side code execution and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Server Side Rendering if: You prioritize it's particularly useful for content-heavy websites like blogs, e-commerce platforms, and news sites where first contentful paint is critical over what Static Web offers.

The Bottom Line

Static Web wins

Developers should use static web approaches for content-heavy sites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing pages where content changes infrequently