Stencil vs Angular Elements

Developers should use Stencil when they need to create framework-agnostic web components for design systems, component libraries, or micro-frontend architectures meets developers should learn angular elements when they need to create reusable ui components that must work across different frameworks or in legacy applications, such as when migrating a large codebase incrementally or building a design system for a multi-framework organization. Here's our take.

Stencil

Nice Pick

Developers should use Stencil when they need to create framework-agnostic web components for design systems, component libraries, or micro-frontend architectures

Pros

• It's ideal for teams building reusable UI elements that must work in multiple frameworks (e
• Related to: web-components, typescript

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Angular Elements

Developers should learn Angular Elements when they need to create reusable UI components that must work across different frameworks or in legacy applications, such as when migrating a large codebase incrementally or building a design system for a multi-framework organization

Pros

• It is particularly useful for embedding Angular components in CMS platforms, micro-frontend architectures, or third-party integrations where framework lock-in is a concern
• Related to: angular, web-components

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Stencil is a tool while Angular Elements is a framework. We picked Stencil based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Stencil wins

Based on overall popularity. Stencil is more widely used, but Angular Elements excels in its own space.