Stream Oriented Protocols vs UDP

Developers should learn stream oriented protocols when building applications requiring reliable data transmission, such as web servers, database connections, or real-time communication systems meets developers should use udp when building applications that require minimal latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as live video/audio streaming, voip, online multiplayer games, or iot sensor data transmission. Here's our take.

Stream Oriented Protocols

Nice Pick

Developers should learn stream oriented protocols when building applications requiring reliable data transmission, such as web servers, database connections, or real-time communication systems

Pros

• They are essential for scenarios where data integrity and order matter, like file transfers or streaming media, as they handle retransmission and sequencing automatically, simplifying application logic compared to datagram protocols
• Related to: tcp, sockets

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

UDP

Developers should use UDP when building applications that require minimal latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as live video/audio streaming, VoIP, online multiplayer games, or IoT sensor data transmission

Pros

• It is also essential for implementing network protocols like DNS and DHCP, where quick, lightweight communication is more important than perfect reliability
• Related to: tcp, networking

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Stream Oriented Protocols is a concept while UDP is a protocol. We picked Stream Oriented Protocols based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Stream Oriented Protocols wins

Based on overall popularity. Stream Oriented Protocols is more widely used, but UDP excels in its own space.