Streams API vs XMLHttpRequest

Developers should learn the Streams API when building web applications that need to handle large files, video/audio streaming, or progressive data loading to improve performance and reduce memory usage meets developers should learn xmlhttprequest for maintaining or updating older web applications that rely on ajax, as it provides backward compatibility with legacy codebases. Here's our take.

Streams API

Nice Pick

Developers should learn the Streams API when building web applications that need to handle large files, video/audio streaming, or progressive data loading to improve performance and reduce memory usage

Pros

• It's essential for scenarios like processing uploaded files without blocking the main thread, implementing custom network protocols, or creating efficient data pipelines in service workers
• Related to: javascript, fetch-api

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

XMLHttpRequest

Developers should learn XMLHttpRequest for maintaining or updating older web applications that rely on AJAX, as it provides backward compatibility with legacy codebases

Pros

• It is also useful for understanding the evolution of web APIs and for scenarios where fine-grained control over HTTP requests (e
• Related to: javascript, ajax

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Streams API is a concept while XMLHttpRequest is a tool. We picked Streams API based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Streams API wins

Based on overall popularity. Streams API is more widely used, but XMLHttpRequest excels in its own space.