Dynamic

Strict Evaluation vs Call By Name

Developers should understand strict evaluation because it underpins the behavior of widely used languages, enabling predictable control flow, efficient resource usage in imperative programming, and straightforward debugging due to immediate execution meets developers should learn call by name when working with languages that support lazy evaluation or need to delay computation until necessary, such as in scala for implementing custom control structures or avoiding unnecessary evaluations. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Strict Evaluation

Developers should understand strict evaluation because it underpins the behavior of widely used languages, enabling predictable control flow, efficient resource usage in imperative programming, and straightforward debugging due to immediate execution

Strict Evaluation

Nice Pick

Developers should understand strict evaluation because it underpins the behavior of widely used languages, enabling predictable control flow, efficient resource usage in imperative programming, and straightforward debugging due to immediate execution

Pros

  • +It is essential for performance-critical applications, real-time systems, and scenarios where side effects (like I/O operations) must occur in a specific, deterministic sequence, such as in financial transactions or embedded systems
  • +Related to: lazy-evaluation, functional-programming

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Call By Name

Developers should learn call by name when working with languages that support lazy evaluation or need to delay computation until necessary, such as in Scala for implementing custom control structures or avoiding unnecessary evaluations

Pros

  • +It is useful in scenarios where arguments might be expensive to compute or have side effects that should only occur if the parameter is actually used, improving performance and enabling more expressive programming patterns like short-circuiting in logical operators
  • +Related to: scala, lambda-calculus

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Strict Evaluation if: You want it is essential for performance-critical applications, real-time systems, and scenarios where side effects (like i/o operations) must occur in a specific, deterministic sequence, such as in financial transactions or embedded systems and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Call By Name if: You prioritize it is useful in scenarios where arguments might be expensive to compute or have side effects that should only occur if the parameter is actually used, improving performance and enabling more expressive programming patterns like short-circuiting in logical operators over what Strict Evaluation offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Strict Evaluation wins

Developers should understand strict evaluation because it underpins the behavior of widely used languages, enabling predictable control flow, efficient resource usage in imperative programming, and straightforward debugging due to immediate execution

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev