Stubs And Drivers vs Mock Objects

Developers should use stubs and drivers during integration testing in large or complex software projects where modules are developed independently or asynchronously meets developers should learn and use mock objects when writing unit tests to achieve test isolation and improve test reliability, especially in complex systems with external dependencies. Here's our take.

Stubs And Drivers

Nice Pick

Developers should use stubs and drivers during integration testing in large or complex software projects where modules are developed independently or asynchronously

Pros

• They are particularly useful in top-down or bottom-up integration approaches to verify module interactions without waiting for all components to be complete, reducing dependencies and allowing early detection of interface errors
• Related to: integration-testing, unit-testing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Mock Objects

Developers should learn and use mock objects when writing unit tests to achieve test isolation and improve test reliability, especially in complex systems with external dependencies

Pros

• They are essential for testing code that interacts with databases, web services, or hardware, as mocks can simulate various scenarios like network failures or slow responses without actual side effects
• Related to: unit-testing, test-driven-development

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Stubs And Drivers is a methodology while Mock Objects is a concept. We picked Stubs And Drivers based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Stubs And Drivers wins

Based on overall popularity. Stubs And Drivers is more widely used, but Mock Objects excels in its own space.