Supabase Realtime vs Socket.IO
Developers should use Supabase Realtime when building applications that require instant data updates, such as live notifications, multiplayer features, or real-time analytics meets developers should use socket. Here's our take.
Supabase Realtime
Developers should use Supabase Realtime when building applications that require instant data updates, such as live notifications, multiplayer features, or real-time analytics
Supabase Realtime
Nice PickDevelopers should use Supabase Realtime when building applications that require instant data updates, such as live notifications, multiplayer features, or real-time analytics
Pros
- +It is particularly useful for scenarios where multiple users need to see changes simultaneously, like in collaborative editing or live sports scores, as it simplifies real-time functionality by handling WebSocket connections and database subscriptions automatically
- +Related to: postgresql, websockets
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Socket.IO
Developers should use Socket
Pros
- +IO when building applications that require low-latency, real-time data exchange, such as chat systems, live dashboards, multiplayer games, or collaborative editing tools
- +Related to: javascript, node-js
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Supabase Realtime is a platform while Socket.IO is a library. We picked Supabase Realtime based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Supabase Realtime is more widely used, but Socket.IO excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev