Dynamic

Supabase Realtime vs Socket.IO

Developers should use Supabase Realtime when building applications that require instant data updates, such as live notifications, multiplayer features, or real-time analytics meets developers should use socket. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Supabase Realtime

Developers should use Supabase Realtime when building applications that require instant data updates, such as live notifications, multiplayer features, or real-time analytics

Supabase Realtime

Nice Pick

Developers should use Supabase Realtime when building applications that require instant data updates, such as live notifications, multiplayer features, or real-time analytics

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful for scenarios where multiple users need to see changes simultaneously, like in collaborative editing or live sports scores, as it simplifies real-time functionality by handling WebSocket connections and database subscriptions automatically
  • +Related to: postgresql, websockets

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Socket.IO

Developers should use Socket

Pros

  • +IO when building applications that require low-latency, real-time data exchange, such as chat systems, live dashboards, multiplayer games, or collaborative editing tools
  • +Related to: javascript, node-js

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Supabase Realtime is a platform while Socket.IO is a library. We picked Supabase Realtime based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Supabase Realtime wins

Based on overall popularity. Supabase Realtime is more widely used, but Socket.IO excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev