Dynamic

Supabase vs Azure Database for MySQL

Postgres + auth + storage + realtime meets mysql with a microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Supabase

Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.

Supabase

Nice Pick

Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.

Pros

  • +Open source
  • +Generous free tier
  • +Full Postgres
  • +Auth built-in
  • +Realtime

Cons

  • -Newer ecosystem
  • -Less documentation
  • -Some rough edges

Azure Database for MySQL

MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database.

Pros

  • +Fully managed with automated backups and patching
  • +High availability built-in with flexible server options
  • +Seamless integration with other Azure services
  • +Strong security features like encryption and firewall rules

Cons

  • -Can get pricey compared to self-hosted MySQL
  • -Limited control over underlying infrastructure

The Verdict

Use Supabase if: You want open source and can live with newer ecosystem.

Use Azure Database for MySQL if: You prioritize fully managed with automated backups and patching over what Supabase offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Supabase wins

Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev