Dynamic
Supabase vs Azure Database for MySQL
Postgres + auth + storage + realtime meets mysql with a microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
Supabase
Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.
Supabase
Nice PickPostgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.
Pros
- +Open source
- +Generous free tier
- +Full Postgres
- +Auth built-in
- +Realtime
Cons
- -Newer ecosystem
- -Less documentation
- -Some rough edges
Azure Database for MySQL
MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database.
Pros
- +Fully managed with automated backups and patching
- +High availability built-in with flexible server options
- +Seamless integration with other Azure services
- +Strong security features like encryption and firewall rules
Cons
- -Can get pricey compared to self-hosted MySQL
- -Limited control over underlying infrastructure
The Verdict
Use Supabase if: You want open source and can live with newer ecosystem.
Use Azure Database for MySQL if: You prioritize fully managed with automated backups and patching over what Supabase offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
Supabase wins
Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev