Dynamic
Supabase vs Apache Cassandra
Postgres + auth + storage + realtime meets the distributed database that scales like a dream but queries like a nightmare. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
Supabase
Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.
Supabase
Nice PickPostgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.
Pros
- +Open source
- +Generous free tier
- +Full Postgres
- +Auth built-in
- +Realtime
Cons
- -Newer ecosystem
- -Less documentation
- -Some rough edges
Apache Cassandra
The distributed database that scales like a dream but queries like a nightmare.
Pros
- +Massive horizontal scalability with no single point of failure
- +Excellent write performance for time-series and IoT data
- +Flexible schema design that evolves without downtime
Cons
- -Complex querying with limited JOIN support
- -Steep learning curve for data modeling and tuning
The Verdict
Use Supabase if: You want open source and can live with newer ecosystem.
Use Apache Cassandra if: You prioritize massive horizontal scalability with no single point of failure over what Supabase offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
Supabase wins
Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev