Dynamic

Supabase vs Apache Cassandra

Postgres + auth + storage + realtime meets the distributed database that scales like a dream but queries like a nightmare. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Supabase

Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.

Supabase

Nice Pick

Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.

Pros

  • +Open source
  • +Generous free tier
  • +Full Postgres
  • +Auth built-in
  • +Realtime

Cons

  • -Newer ecosystem
  • -Less documentation
  • -Some rough edges

Apache Cassandra

The distributed database that scales like a dream but queries like a nightmare.

Pros

  • +Massive horizontal scalability with no single point of failure
  • +Excellent write performance for time-series and IoT data
  • +Flexible schema design that evolves without downtime

Cons

  • -Complex querying with limited JOIN support
  • -Steep learning curve for data modeling and tuning

The Verdict

Use Supabase if: You want open source and can live with newer ecosystem.

Use Apache Cassandra if: You prioritize massive horizontal scalability with no single point of failure over what Supabase offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Supabase wins

Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev