Dynamic

Supabase vs SQL Server

Postgres + auth + storage + realtime meets the corporate database that loves windows and hates your budget. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Supabase

Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.

Supabase

Nice Pick

Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.

Pros

  • +Open source
  • +Generous free tier
  • +Full Postgres
  • +Auth built-in
  • +Realtime

Cons

  • -Newer ecosystem
  • -Less documentation
  • -Some rough edges

SQL Server

The corporate database that loves Windows and hates your budget.

Pros

  • +Excellent integration with Microsoft ecosystem (e.g., .NET, Azure)
  • +Strong security and compliance features out of the box
  • +Powerful business intelligence tools like SSRS and SSAS

Cons

  • -Licensing costs can be eye-watering for enterprise use
  • -Limited cross-platform support (primarily Windows-focused)

The Verdict

Use Supabase if: You want open source and can live with newer ecosystem.

Use SQL Server if: You prioritize excellent integration with microsoft ecosystem (e.g., .net, azure) over what Supabase offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Supabase wins

Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev