Dynamic
Supabase vs SQL Server
Postgres + auth + storage + realtime meets the corporate database that loves windows and hates your budget. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
Supabase
Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.
Supabase
Nice PickPostgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.
Pros
- +Open source
- +Generous free tier
- +Full Postgres
- +Auth built-in
- +Realtime
Cons
- -Newer ecosystem
- -Less documentation
- -Some rough edges
SQL Server
The corporate database that loves Windows and hates your budget.
Pros
- +Excellent integration with Microsoft ecosystem (e.g., .NET, Azure)
- +Strong security and compliance features out of the box
- +Powerful business intelligence tools like SSRS and SSAS
Cons
- -Licensing costs can be eye-watering for enterprise use
- -Limited cross-platform support (primarily Windows-focused)
The Verdict
Use Supabase if: You want open source and can live with newer ecosystem.
Use SQL Server if: You prioritize excellent integration with microsoft ecosystem (e.g., .net, azure) over what Supabase offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
Supabase wins
Postgres + auth + storage + realtime. The Firebase that doesn't lock you in.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev