Dynamic

Supervisord vs PM2

Developers should use Supervisord when they need to manage and supervise long-running processes in production or development environments, especially for applications that must stay alive (e meets developers should use pm2 when deploying node. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Supervisord

Developers should use Supervisord when they need to manage and supervise long-running processes in production or development environments, especially for applications that must stay alive (e

Supervisord

Nice Pick

Developers should use Supervisord when they need to manage and supervise long-running processes in production or development environments, especially for applications that must stay alive (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: python, systemd

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

PM2

Developers should use PM2 when deploying Node

Pros

  • +js applications to production servers to ensure high availability, manage multiple instances for load balancing, and simplify application lifecycle management
  • +Related to: node-js, javascript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Supervisord if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use PM2 if: You prioritize js applications to production servers to ensure high availability, manage multiple instances for load balancing, and simplify application lifecycle management over what Supervisord offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Supervisord wins

Developers should use Supervisord when they need to manage and supervise long-running processes in production or development environments, especially for applications that must stay alive (e

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev