Dynamic

SvelteKit vs Astro

The framework that actually makes you feel productive, not just busy meets the framework that finally gets it: less javascript is more, especially when you can still use all your favorite toys. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

SvelteKit

The framework that actually makes you feel productive, not just busy.

SvelteKit

Nice Pick

The framework that actually makes you feel productive, not just busy.

Pros

  • +Zero boilerplate routing with file-based conventions
  • +Built-in server-side rendering that just works
  • +Compiler-based optimizations for tiny bundle sizes
  • +Integrated API endpoints without extra configuration

Cons

  • -Smaller ecosystem compared to React/Next.js
  • -Breaking changes between major versions can be disruptive

Astro

The framework that finally gets it: less JavaScript is more, especially when you can still use all your favorite toys.

Pros

  • +Zero JavaScript by default for lightning-fast static sites
  • +Mix and match React, Vue, or Svelte components without framework lock-in
  • +Excellent SEO and performance out of the box
  • +Built-in support for islands architecture for partial hydration

Cons

  • -Can feel overkill for simple projects due to its component-heavy approach
  • -Limited real-time interactivity without manual JavaScript additions

The Verdict

Use SvelteKit if: You want zero boilerplate routing with file-based conventions and can live with smaller ecosystem compared to react/next.js.

Use Astro if: You prioritize zero javascript by default for lightning-fast static sites over what SvelteKit offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
SvelteKit wins

The framework that actually makes you feel productive, not just busy.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev