SWC vs Babel

Developers should use SWC when they need high-performance compilation and bundling for JavaScript or TypeScript projects, especially in large-scale applications where build speed is critical meets developers should use babel when building web applications that need to support older browsers like internet explorer or when using cutting-edge javascript features not yet universally supported. Here's our take.

SWC

Nice Pick

Developers should use SWC when they need high-performance compilation and bundling for JavaScript or TypeScript projects, especially in large-scale applications where build speed is critical

Pros

• It is ideal for frameworks like Next
• Related to: rust, javascript

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Babel

Developers should use Babel when building web applications that need to support older browsers like Internet Explorer or when using cutting-edge JavaScript features not yet universally supported

Pros

• It is essential in modern front-end development workflows, especially with frameworks like React, to transpile JSX and ES6+ syntax into ES5 for production deployment
• Related to: javascript, es6

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use SWC if: You want it is ideal for frameworks like next and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Babel if: You prioritize it is essential in modern front-end development workflows, especially with frameworks like react, to transpile jsx and es6+ syntax into es5 for production deployment over what SWC offers.

The Bottom Line

SWC wins

Developers should use SWC when they need high-performance compilation and bundling for JavaScript or TypeScript projects, especially in large-scale applications where build speed is critical