System Hardening vs System Patching

Developers should learn system hardening to build and maintain secure applications and infrastructure, especially in production environments or when handling sensitive data meets developers should learn system patching to secure applications and infrastructure, as unpatched systems are prime targets for cyberattacks like data breaches or ransomware. Here's our take.

System Hardening

Nice Pick

Developers should learn system hardening to build and maintain secure applications and infrastructure, especially in production environments or when handling sensitive data

Pros

• It is critical for roles in DevOps, cybersecurity, and cloud computing, where systems must comply with security standards like ISO 27001 or GDPR
• Related to: cybersecurity, devsecops

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

System Patching

Developers should learn system patching to secure applications and infrastructure, as unpatched systems are prime targets for cyberattacks like data breaches or ransomware

Pros

• It's essential in roles involving system administration, cloud management, or DevOps, where maintaining uptime and compliance (e
• Related to: devops, cybersecurity

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. System Hardening is a concept while System Patching is a methodology. We picked System Hardening based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

System Hardening wins

Based on overall popularity. System Hardening is more widely used, but System Patching excels in its own space.