System Monitoring vs Manual Testing

Developers should learn system monitoring to build resilient, scalable applications and maintain production systems effectively meets developers should learn manual testing to quickly validate new features, perform exploratory testing to uncover unexpected issues, and ensure user-centric quality before investing in automation. Here's our take.

System Monitoring

Nice Pick

Developers should learn system monitoring to build resilient, scalable applications and maintain production systems effectively

Pros

• It is essential for identifying performance bottlenecks, debugging failures, ensuring uptime in cloud or on-premise environments, and meeting service-level agreements (SLAs)
• Related to: observability, log-management

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Manual Testing

Developers should learn manual testing to quickly validate new features, perform exploratory testing to uncover unexpected issues, and ensure user-centric quality before investing in automation

Pros

• It is particularly useful in early development stages, for usability testing, and in agile environments where rapid feedback is needed
• Related to: test-cases, bug-tracking

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. System Monitoring is a concept while Manual Testing is a methodology. We picked System Monitoring based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

System Monitoring wins

Based on overall popularity. System Monitoring is more widely used, but Manual Testing excels in its own space.