Dynamic

SysV Runlevels vs Systemd

Developers should learn SysV Runlevels when working with legacy Unix systems, older Linux distributions (e meets developers should learn systemd because it is the default init system in most modern linux distributions (e. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

SysV Runlevels

Developers should learn SysV Runlevels when working with legacy Unix systems, older Linux distributions (e

SysV Runlevels

Nice Pick

Developers should learn SysV Runlevels when working with legacy Unix systems, older Linux distributions (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: systemd, init-scripts

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Systemd

Developers should learn Systemd because it is the default init system in most modern Linux distributions (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: linux-administration, bash-scripting

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. SysV Runlevels is a concept while Systemd is a tool. We picked SysV Runlevels based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
SysV Runlevels wins

Based on overall popularity. SysV Runlevels is more widely used, but Systemd excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev