Dynamic

Tabnine vs Figma

The AI autocomplete that's either a lifesaver or a code-copier, depending on how much you trust it meets the design tool that finally made collaboration not feel like pulling teeth. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Tabnine

The AI autocomplete that's either a lifesaver or a code-copier, depending on how much you trust it.

Tabnine

Nice Pick

The AI autocomplete that's either a lifesaver or a code-copier, depending on how much you trust it.

Pros

  • +Surprisingly accurate suggestions for common code patterns
  • +Integrates seamlessly with VS Code, IntelliJ, and other popular IDEs
  • +Speeds up boilerplate and repetitive coding tasks
  • +Works offline with local models for privacy-conscious devs

Cons

  • -Can suggest outdated or insecure code snippets from its training data
  • -Free version is limited, and the paid plans are pricey for what you get

Figma

The design tool that finally made collaboration not feel like pulling teeth.

Pros

  • +Real-time collaboration that actually works without version conflicts
  • +Browser-based so no more 'sorry, I don't have the right software' excuses
  • +Component libraries and design systems that stay in sync across teams
  • +Prototyping that doesn't require exporting to three different tools first

Cons

  • -Offline mode is basically 'good luck with that'
  • -Performance can chug when you have too many frames (we see you, design system hoarders)
  • -The free tier is generous until you need more than three projects

The Verdict

Use Tabnine if: You want surprisingly accurate suggestions for common code patterns and can live with can suggest outdated or insecure code snippets from its training data.

Use Figma if: You prioritize real-time collaboration that actually works without version conflicts over what Tabnine offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Tabnine wins

The AI autocomplete that's either a lifesaver or a code-copier, depending on how much you trust it.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev