Target Encoding vs Frequency Encoding
Developers should learn target encoding when working with categorical data that has many unique values (high cardinality), as traditional one-hot encoding can lead to sparse, high-dimensional datasets meets developers should learn frequency encoding when working with categorical data in machine learning models, especially for tree-based algorithms like decision trees or gradient boosting, as it can improve model performance by reducing dimensionality compared to one-hot encoding. Here's our take.
Target Encoding
Developers should learn target encoding when working with categorical data that has many unique values (high cardinality), as traditional one-hot encoding can lead to sparse, high-dimensional datasets
Target Encoding
Nice PickDevelopers should learn target encoding when working with categorical data that has many unique values (high cardinality), as traditional one-hot encoding can lead to sparse, high-dimensional datasets
Pros
- +It is especially useful in competitions like Kaggle or in production models for tabular data, such as predicting customer churn or sales, where it can capture meaningful patterns without excessive dimensionality
- +Related to: feature-engineering, categorical-encoding
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Frequency Encoding
Developers should learn frequency encoding when working with categorical data in machine learning models, especially for tree-based algorithms like decision trees or gradient boosting, as it can improve model performance by reducing dimensionality compared to one-hot encoding
Pros
- +It's ideal for datasets with many unique categories, such as zip codes or product IDs, where frequency might correlate with the target variable
- +Related to: feature-engineering, categorical-encoding
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Target Encoding if: You want it is especially useful in competitions like kaggle or in production models for tabular data, such as predicting customer churn or sales, where it can capture meaningful patterns without excessive dimensionality and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Frequency Encoding if: You prioritize it's ideal for datasets with many unique categories, such as zip codes or product ids, where frequency might correlate with the target variable over what Target Encoding offers.
Developers should learn target encoding when working with categorical data that has many unique values (high cardinality), as traditional one-hot encoding can lead to sparse, high-dimensional datasets
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev