Template Engines vs Static Site Generator

Developers should use template engines when building web applications to dynamically render content, such as user-specific data or product listings, without cluttering code with HTML strings meets developers should use static site generators for content-heavy websites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing sites where content changes infrequently. Here's our take.

Template Engines

Nice Pick

Developers should use template engines when building web applications to dynamically render content, such as user-specific data or product listings, without cluttering code with HTML strings

Pros

• They are essential for server-side rendering in frameworks like Django or Express
• Related to: jinja2, handlebars

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Static Site Generator

Developers should use Static Site Generators for content-heavy websites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing sites where content changes infrequently

Pros

• They are ideal when performance, security, and low hosting costs are priorities, as static files reduce server load and vulnerabilities compared to dynamic server-rendered sites
• Related to: markdown, git

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Template Engines if: You want they are essential for server-side rendering in frameworks like django or express and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Static Site Generator if: You prioritize they are ideal when performance, security, and low hosting costs are priorities, as static files reduce server load and vulnerabilities compared to dynamic server-rendered sites over what Template Engines offers.

The Bottom Line

Template Engines wins

Developers should use template engines when building web applications to dynamically render content, such as user-specific data or product listings, without cluttering code with HTML strings