Templating Engines vs Static HTML

Developers should use templating engines when building web applications, generating reports, or creating dynamic documents to avoid code duplication and improve maintainability meets developers should learn and use static html for building simple, high-performance websites where content rarely changes, such as portfolios, blogs, or marketing pages, as it reduces server load and improves load times. Here's our take.

Templating Engines

Nice Pick

Developers should use templating engines when building web applications, generating reports, or creating dynamic documents to avoid code duplication and improve maintainability

Pros

• They are essential for server-side rendering in frameworks like Express
• Related to: server-side-rendering, frontend-frameworks

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Static HTML

Developers should learn and use Static HTML for building simple, high-performance websites where content rarely changes, such as portfolios, blogs, or marketing pages, as it reduces server load and improves load times

Pros

• It is essential for front-end web development, serving as the base for more complex frameworks and tools, and is crucial for SEO optimization and accessibility compliance in web projects
• Related to: css, javascript

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Templating Engines is a tool while Static HTML is a language. We picked Templating Engines based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Templating Engines wins

Based on overall popularity. Templating Engines is more widely used, but Static HTML excels in its own space.