Third Party Accessibility Libraries vs Accessibility Audit Tools
Developers should use third party accessibility libraries when building web or mobile applications that need to comply with legal requirements (e meets developers should learn and use accessibility audit tools to ensure their products are usable by people with diverse abilities, which is often a legal requirement (e. Here's our take.
Third Party Accessibility Libraries
Developers should use third party accessibility libraries when building web or mobile applications that need to comply with legal requirements (e
Third Party Accessibility Libraries
Nice PickDevelopers should use third party accessibility libraries when building web or mobile applications that need to comply with legal requirements (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: web-accessibility, aria
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Accessibility Audit Tools
Developers should learn and use accessibility audit tools to ensure their products are usable by people with diverse abilities, which is often a legal requirement (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: web-accessibility, wcag-guidelines
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Third Party Accessibility Libraries is a library while Accessibility Audit Tools is a tool. We picked Third Party Accessibility Libraries based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Third Party Accessibility Libraries is more widely used, but Accessibility Audit Tools excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev