Third Party Accessibility Libraries vs Custom Accessibility Code
Developers should use third party accessibility libraries when building web or mobile applications that need to comply with legal requirements (e meets developers should learn custom accessibility code when building applications that require specific, complex interactions beyond what standard ui components provide, such as custom form controls, drag-and-drop interfaces, or dynamic content updates. Here's our take.
Third Party Accessibility Libraries
Developers should use third party accessibility libraries when building web or mobile applications that need to comply with legal requirements (e
Third Party Accessibility Libraries
Nice PickDevelopers should use third party accessibility libraries when building web or mobile applications that need to comply with legal requirements (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: web-accessibility, aria
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Custom Accessibility Code
Developers should learn custom accessibility code when building applications that require specific, complex interactions beyond what standard UI components provide, such as custom form controls, drag-and-drop interfaces, or dynamic content updates
Pros
- +It is crucial for ensuring legal compliance (e
- +Related to: web-accessibility, aria-attributes
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Third Party Accessibility Libraries is a library while Custom Accessibility Code is a concept. We picked Third Party Accessibility Libraries based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Third Party Accessibility Libraries is more widely used, but Custom Accessibility Code excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev