Third-Party Authentication Providers vs Custom Authentication
Developers should use third-party authentication providers when building applications that require user logins, especially for consumer-facing apps where convenience and security are priorities meets developers should learn custom authentication when building applications with specialized security requirements, such as high-compliance industries (e. Here's our take.
Third-Party Authentication Providers
Developers should use third-party authentication providers when building applications that require user logins, especially for consumer-facing apps where convenience and security are priorities
Third-Party Authentication Providers
Nice PickDevelopers should use third-party authentication providers when building applications that require user logins, especially for consumer-facing apps where convenience and security are priorities
Pros
- +They are ideal for reducing development time, enhancing security with industry-standard protocols like OAuth 2
- +Related to: oauth-2.0, openid-connect
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Custom Authentication
Developers should learn custom authentication when building applications with specialized security requirements, such as high-compliance industries (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: jwt, oauth
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Third-Party Authentication Providers is a platform while Custom Authentication is a concept. We picked Third-Party Authentication Providers based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Third-Party Authentication Providers is more widely used, but Custom Authentication excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev