Third-Party Authentication Providers vs Self-Hosted Identity Server

Developers should use third-party authentication providers when building applications that require user logins, especially for consumer-facing apps where convenience and security are priorities meets developers should use self-hosted identity servers when building enterprise applications that require strict data privacy, regulatory compliance (e. Here's our take.

Third-Party Authentication Providers

Nice Pick

Developers should use third-party authentication providers when building applications that require user logins, especially for consumer-facing apps where convenience and security are priorities

Pros

• They are ideal for reducing development time, enhancing security with industry-standard protocols like OAuth 2
• Related to: oauth-2.0, openid-connect

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Self-Hosted Identity Server

Developers should use self-hosted identity servers when building enterprise applications that require strict data privacy, regulatory compliance (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: oauth-2.0, openid-connect

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Third-Party Authentication Providers if: You want they are ideal for reducing development time, enhancing security with industry-standard protocols like oauth 2 and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Self-Hosted Identity Server if: You prioritize g over what Third-Party Authentication Providers offers.

The Bottom Line

Third-Party Authentication Providers wins

Developers should use third-party authentication providers when building applications that require user logins, especially for consumer-facing apps where convenience and security are priorities