Threat Emulation vs Vulnerability Scanning

Developers should learn threat emulation to build more secure applications by understanding how attackers operate and proactively testing their code and systems against realistic threats meets developers should learn and use vulnerability scanning to integrate security into the software development lifecycle (sdlc), particularly in devsecops practices, to proactively identify and fix security issues before deployment. Here's our take.

Threat Emulation

Nice Pick

Developers should learn threat emulation to build more secure applications by understanding how attackers operate and proactively testing their code and systems against realistic threats

Pros

• It is crucial in roles involving security engineering, penetration testing, or DevSecOps, especially for organizations in high-risk industries like finance or healthcare, to comply with regulations and reduce breach risks
• Related to: penetration-testing, incident-response

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Vulnerability Scanning

Developers should learn and use vulnerability scanning to integrate security into the software development lifecycle (SDLC), particularly in DevSecOps practices, to proactively identify and fix security issues before deployment

Pros

• It is essential for compliance with security standards (e
• Related to: penetration-testing, static-application-security-testing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Threat Emulation is a methodology while Vulnerability Scanning is a tool. We picked Threat Emulation based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Threat Emulation wins

Based on overall popularity. Threat Emulation is more widely used, but Vulnerability Scanning excels in its own space.