Thymeleaf vs Freemarker

Developers should learn Thymeleaf when building server-side rendered web applications with Java, especially in Spring-based projects, as it provides a clean separation of concerns and supports natural templating meets developers should learn freemarker when building java web applications that require server-side rendering of dynamic content, such as with spring mvc or apache struts, as it integrates seamlessly and offers a clean separation of concerns. Here's our take.

Thymeleaf

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Thymeleaf when building server-side rendered web applications with Java, especially in Spring-based projects, as it provides a clean separation of concerns and supports natural templating

Pros

• It is ideal for use cases like generating dynamic HTML content, email templates, or reports where server-side processing is required, and it avoids the need for complex JavaScript frameworks for simple dynamic pages
• Related to: spring-framework, java

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Freemarker

Developers should learn Freemarker when building Java web applications that require server-side rendering of dynamic content, such as with Spring MVC or Apache Struts, as it integrates seamlessly and offers a clean separation of concerns

Pros

• It's also useful for generating emails, reports, or configuration files where template-based text generation is needed, providing a lightweight and efficient alternative to JSP for many use cases
• Related to: java, spring-mvc

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Thymeleaf is a library while Freemarker is a template engine. We picked Thymeleaf based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Thymeleaf wins

Based on overall popularity. Thymeleaf is more widely used, but Freemarker excels in its own space.