TinyMCE vs Quill

Developers should use TinyMCE when building web applications that require rich-text editing capabilities, such as CMS dashboards, blog editors, or admin panels where users need to create formatted content meets developers should use quill when building web applications that require rich text editing functionality, such as content management systems (cms), blogging platforms, collaborative tools, or any interface where users need to create formatted content. Here's our take.

TinyMCE

Nice Pick

Developers should use TinyMCE when building web applications that require rich-text editing capabilities, such as CMS dashboards, blog editors, or admin panels where users need to create formatted content

Pros

• It is particularly valuable for projects that prioritize ease of integration, customization, and accessibility, as it offers extensive APIs, plugins, and themes to tailor the editor to specific needs
• Related to: javascript, html

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Quill

Developers should use Quill when building web applications that require rich text editing functionality, such as content management systems (CMS), blogging platforms, collaborative tools, or any interface where users need to create formatted content

Pros

• It is particularly valuable for projects needing a lightweight, customizable editor without the bloat of larger frameworks, and its modular design allows for easy integration with modern JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue, or Angular
• Related to: javascript, react

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. TinyMCE is a tool while Quill is a library. We picked TinyMCE based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

TinyMCE wins

Based on overall popularity. TinyMCE is more widely used, but Quill excels in its own space.