Dynamic

TLS 1.3 vs SSL 3.0

Developers should learn and implement TLS 1 meets developers should learn about ssl 3. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

TLS 1.3

Developers should learn and implement TLS 1

TLS 1.3

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and implement TLS 1

Pros

  • +3 when building web applications, APIs, or any networked service requiring secure data transmission, as it offers stronger encryption, faster connection establishment, and better protection against attacks like downgrade and eavesdropping
  • +Related to: https, ssl

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

SSL 3.0

Developers should learn about SSL 3

Pros

  • +0 primarily for historical context and to understand the evolution of internet security protocols, as it laid the groundwork for TLS (Transport Layer Security)
  • +Related to: tls, https

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use TLS 1.3 if: You want 3 when building web applications, apis, or any networked service requiring secure data transmission, as it offers stronger encryption, faster connection establishment, and better protection against attacks like downgrade and eavesdropping and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use SSL 3.0 if: You prioritize 0 primarily for historical context and to understand the evolution of internet security protocols, as it laid the groundwork for tls (transport layer security) over what TLS 1.3 offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
TLS 1.3 wins

Developers should learn and implement TLS 1

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev