TPM vs Software-Based Security

Developers should learn about TPM when working on security-critical applications, such as those involving encryption, authentication, or compliance with standards like FIPS 140-2 meets developers should learn and apply software-based security to protect applications from common threats like data breaches, injection attacks, and unauthorized access, especially in distributed systems and internet-facing services. Here's our take.

TPM

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about TPM when working on security-critical applications, such as those involving encryption, authentication, or compliance with standards like FIPS 140-2

Pros

• It is essential for implementing features like BitLocker on Windows, secure key storage in cloud environments, and hardware-based attestation in IoT devices
• Related to: hardware-security, cryptography

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Software-Based Security

Developers should learn and apply software-based security to protect applications from common threats like data breaches, injection attacks, and unauthorized access, especially in distributed systems and internet-facing services

Pros

• It is essential for compliance with regulations (e
• Related to: secure-coding, encryption

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. TPM is a tool while Software-Based Security is a concept. We picked TPM based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

TPM wins

Based on overall popularity. TPM is more widely used, but Software-Based Security excels in its own space.