Traditional Compliance Frameworks vs Continuous Compliance

Developers should learn about traditional compliance frameworks when building applications in regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, or government, where legal requirements mandate specific security and privacy measures meets developers should learn and implement continuous compliance when working in regulated industries (e. Here's our take.

Traditional Compliance Frameworks

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about traditional compliance frameworks when building applications in regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, or government, where legal requirements mandate specific security and privacy measures

Pros

• Understanding these frameworks helps ensure that software designs and implementations meet compliance obligations, reducing legal risks and building trust with users and regulators
• Related to: risk-management, data-privacy

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Continuous Compliance

Developers should learn and implement Continuous Compliance when working in regulated industries (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: devsecops, ci-cd-pipelines

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Traditional Compliance Frameworks if: You want understanding these frameworks helps ensure that software designs and implementations meet compliance obligations, reducing legal risks and building trust with users and regulators and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Continuous Compliance if: You prioritize g over what Traditional Compliance Frameworks offers.

The Bottom Line

Traditional Compliance Frameworks wins

Developers should learn about traditional compliance frameworks when building applications in regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, or government, where legal requirements mandate specific security and privacy measures