Traditional Compliance vs Continuous Compliance

Developers should understand Traditional Compliance when working in highly regulated industries like finance, healthcare, or government, where strict adherence to legal and regulatory frameworks is mandatory meets developers should learn and implement continuous compliance when working in regulated industries (e. Here's our take.

Traditional Compliance

Nice Pick

Developers should understand Traditional Compliance when working in highly regulated industries like finance, healthcare, or government, where strict adherence to legal and regulatory frameworks is mandatory

Pros

• It's essential for building systems that pass audits, avoid penalties, and maintain data integrity, though it often requires manual effort and can slow down development cycles compared to modern approaches
• Related to: regulatory-frameworks, risk-management

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Continuous Compliance

Developers should learn and implement Continuous Compliance when working in regulated industries (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: devsecops, ci-cd-pipelines

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Traditional Compliance if: You want it's essential for building systems that pass audits, avoid penalties, and maintain data integrity, though it often requires manual effort and can slow down development cycles compared to modern approaches and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Continuous Compliance if: You prioritize g over what Traditional Compliance offers.

The Bottom Line

Traditional Compliance wins

Developers should understand Traditional Compliance when working in highly regulated industries like finance, healthcare, or government, where strict adherence to legal and regulatory frameworks is mandatory