Traditional Infrastructure Security vs DevSecOps

Developers should learn Traditional Infrastructure Security when working in environments that rely on on-premises or legacy systems, such as in industries with strict regulatory compliance (e meets developers should adopt devsecops to enhance application security, reduce risks from data breaches, and meet regulatory requirements like gdpr or hipaa, especially in industries like finance or healthcare. Here's our take.

Traditional Infrastructure Security

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Traditional Infrastructure Security when working in environments that rely on on-premises or legacy systems, such as in industries with strict regulatory compliance (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: network-security, firewall-configuration

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

DevSecOps

Developers should adopt DevSecOps to enhance application security, reduce risks from data breaches, and meet regulatory requirements like GDPR or HIPAA, especially in industries like finance or healthcare

Pros

• It's crucial for modern cloud-native and microservices architectures where traditional security models fall short, enabling faster and safer deployments through automated security testing and monitoring
• Related to: devops, continuous-integration

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Traditional Infrastructure Security is a concept while DevSecOps is a methodology. We picked Traditional Infrastructure Security based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Traditional Infrastructure Security wins

Based on overall popularity. Traditional Infrastructure Security is more widely used, but DevSecOps excels in its own space.