Traditional Infrastructure Security vs Zero Trust Architecture

Developers should learn Traditional Infrastructure Security when working in environments that rely on on-premises or legacy systems, such as in industries with strict regulatory compliance (e meets developers should learn zero trust architecture to build secure applications in modern environments like cloud, remote work, and iot, where traditional network perimeters are ineffective. Here's our take.

Traditional Infrastructure Security

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Traditional Infrastructure Security when working in environments that rely on on-premises or legacy systems, such as in industries with strict regulatory compliance (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: network-security, firewall-configuration

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Zero Trust Architecture

Developers should learn Zero Trust Architecture to build secure applications in modern environments like cloud, remote work, and IoT, where traditional network perimeters are ineffective

Pros

• It's essential for compliance with regulations (e
• Related to: identity-and-access-management, network-security

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Traditional Infrastructure Security if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Zero Trust Architecture if: You prioritize it's essential for compliance with regulations (e over what Traditional Infrastructure Security offers.

The Bottom Line

Traditional Infrastructure Security wins

Developers should learn Traditional Infrastructure Security when working in environments that rely on on-premises or legacy systems, such as in industries with strict regulatory compliance (e