Traditional Release Processes vs Continuous Delivery

Developers should learn about traditional release processes to understand historical software development practices and when they might still be applicable, such as in highly regulated industries (e meets developers should adopt continuous delivery to accelerate software delivery, improve quality, and reduce deployment failures. Here's our take.

Traditional Release Processes

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about traditional release processes to understand historical software development practices and when they might still be applicable, such as in highly regulated industries (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: waterfall-methodology, software-development-lifecycle

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Continuous Delivery

Developers should adopt Continuous Delivery to accelerate software delivery, improve quality, and reduce deployment failures

Pros

• It's essential for teams practicing DevOps, microservices architectures, or cloud-native development where frequent updates are required
• Related to: continuous-integration, devops

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Traditional Release Processes if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Continuous Delivery if: You prioritize it's essential for teams practicing devops, microservices architectures, or cloud-native development where frequent updates are required over what Traditional Release Processes offers.

The Bottom Line

Traditional Release Processes wins

Developers should learn about traditional release processes to understand historical software development practices and when they might still be applicable, such as in highly regulated industries (e