Dynamic

Traditional Security Testing vs Automated Security Testing

Developers should learn Traditional Security Testing to build secure applications and comply with industry standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI-DSS, or GDPR, especially in finance, healthcare, and e-commerce sectors meets developers should learn and implement automated security testing to proactively identify and fix security vulnerabilities early in development, reducing the risk of breaches and compliance issues. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Traditional Security Testing

Developers should learn Traditional Security Testing to build secure applications and comply with industry standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI-DSS, or GDPR, especially in finance, healthcare, and e-commerce sectors

Traditional Security Testing

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Traditional Security Testing to build secure applications and comply with industry standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI-DSS, or GDPR, especially in finance, healthcare, and e-commerce sectors

Pros

  • +It is crucial during the development lifecycle to identify and fix vulnerabilities early, reducing risks of data breaches, financial losses, and reputational damage
  • +Related to: penetration-testing, vulnerability-scanning

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Automated Security Testing

Developers should learn and implement automated security testing to proactively identify and fix security vulnerabilities early in development, reducing the risk of breaches and compliance issues

Pros

  • +It is essential for modern DevOps/DevSecOps practices, enabling continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines to include security checks automatically
  • +Related to: devsecops, penetration-testing

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Traditional Security Testing if: You want it is crucial during the development lifecycle to identify and fix vulnerabilities early, reducing risks of data breaches, financial losses, and reputational damage and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Automated Security Testing if: You prioritize it is essential for modern devops/devsecops practices, enabling continuous integration/continuous deployment (ci/cd) pipelines to include security checks automatically over what Traditional Security Testing offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Traditional Security Testing wins

Developers should learn Traditional Security Testing to build secure applications and comply with industry standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI-DSS, or GDPR, especially in finance, healthcare, and e-commerce sectors

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev