Dynamic

Traditional Security Testing vs Shift Left Security

Developers should learn Traditional Security Testing to build secure applications and comply with industry standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI-DSS, or GDPR, especially in finance, healthcare, and e-commerce sectors meets developers should adopt shift left security to build more secure applications from the ground up, as it helps catch vulnerabilities early when they are cheaper and easier to fix, reducing the likelihood of costly breaches or rework. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Traditional Security Testing

Developers should learn Traditional Security Testing to build secure applications and comply with industry standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI-DSS, or GDPR, especially in finance, healthcare, and e-commerce sectors

Traditional Security Testing

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Traditional Security Testing to build secure applications and comply with industry standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI-DSS, or GDPR, especially in finance, healthcare, and e-commerce sectors

Pros

  • +It is crucial during the development lifecycle to identify and fix vulnerabilities early, reducing risks of data breaches, financial losses, and reputational damage
  • +Related to: penetration-testing, vulnerability-scanning

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Shift Left Security

Developers should adopt Shift Left Security to build more secure applications from the ground up, as it helps catch vulnerabilities early when they are cheaper and easier to fix, reducing the likelihood of costly breaches or rework

Pros

  • +It is particularly valuable in agile and DevOps environments where rapid development cycles require continuous security integration, such as in cloud-native applications, microservices architectures, or compliance-driven industries like finance and healthcare
  • +Related to: devsecops, static-application-security-testing

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Traditional Security Testing if: You want it is crucial during the development lifecycle to identify and fix vulnerabilities early, reducing risks of data breaches, financial losses, and reputational damage and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Shift Left Security if: You prioritize it is particularly valuable in agile and devops environments where rapid development cycles require continuous security integration, such as in cloud-native applications, microservices architectures, or compliance-driven industries like finance and healthcare over what Traditional Security Testing offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Traditional Security Testing wins

Developers should learn Traditional Security Testing to build secure applications and comply with industry standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI-DSS, or GDPR, especially in finance, healthcare, and e-commerce sectors

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev