Traditional VPN vs Zero Trust Network Access

Developers should learn and use traditional VPNs when building or maintaining systems that require secure remote access to internal resources, such as corporate networks, databases, or development environments meets developers should learn ztna to build and deploy secure applications in modern environments like cloud, remote work, and hybrid infrastructures, where traditional perimeter-based security is insufficient. Here's our take.

Traditional VPN

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use traditional VPNs when building or maintaining systems that require secure remote access to internal resources, such as corporate networks, databases, or development environments

Pros

• It is essential for scenarios like enabling remote work, connecting branch offices, or securing communications in hybrid cloud setups, providing a foundational layer of network security
• Related to: network-security, ipsec

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Zero Trust Network Access

Developers should learn ZTNA to build and deploy secure applications in modern environments like cloud, remote work, and hybrid infrastructures, where traditional perimeter-based security is insufficient

Pros

• It's crucial for implementing robust access controls in microservices architectures, SaaS applications, and compliance-driven projects (e
• Related to: identity-and-access-management, network-security

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Traditional VPN is a tool while Zero Trust Network Access is a concept. We picked Traditional VPN based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Traditional VPN wins

Based on overall popularity. Traditional VPN is more widely used, but Zero Trust Network Access excels in its own space.