Traditional Waterfall Methodology vs Agile Methodology

Developers should use this methodology in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems (e meets developers should learn agile when working in dynamic environments where requirements evolve frequently, as it enables teams to deliver value quickly and adapt to feedback. Here's our take.

Traditional Waterfall Methodology

Nice Pick

Developers should use this methodology in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: software-development-lifecycle, project-management

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Agile Methodology

Developers should learn Agile when working in dynamic environments where requirements evolve frequently, as it enables teams to deliver value quickly and adapt to feedback

Pros

• It is particularly useful for complex projects with uncertain outcomes, startups, and industries like tech and finance where rapid innovation is critical
• Related to: scrum, kanban

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Traditional Waterfall Methodology if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Agile Methodology if: You prioritize it is particularly useful for complex projects with uncertain outcomes, startups, and industries like tech and finance where rapid innovation is critical over what Traditional Waterfall Methodology offers.

The Bottom Line

Traditional Waterfall Methodology wins

Developers should use this methodology in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems (e