Traditional Web Protocols vs gRPC

Developers should learn traditional web protocols to understand how web applications communicate and function at a fundamental level, which is crucial for debugging, optimizing performance, and ensuring security meets developers should learn grpc when building microservices architectures, real-time applications, or systems requiring low-latency, high-throughput communication, such as in cloud-native environments or iot platforms. Here's our take.

Traditional Web Protocols

Nice Pick

Developers should learn traditional web protocols to understand how web applications communicate and function at a fundamental level, which is crucial for debugging, optimizing performance, and ensuring security

Pros

• For example, knowledge of HTTP/HTTPS is necessary for building RESTful APIs, handling requests/responses, and implementing SSL/TLS encryption, while FTP is used for file transfers in web hosting scenarios
• Related to: http, https

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

gRPC

Developers should learn gRPC when building microservices architectures, real-time applications, or systems requiring low-latency, high-throughput communication, such as in cloud-native environments or IoT platforms

Pros

• It is particularly useful for polyglot systems where services are written in different languages, as it provides language-agnostic contracts via protobuf
• Related to: protocol-buffers, http-2

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Traditional Web Protocols is a concept while gRPC is a framework. We picked Traditional Web Protocols based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Traditional Web Protocols wins

Based on overall popularity. Traditional Web Protocols is more widely used, but gRPC excels in its own space.