TypeScript vs JavaScript

JavaScript with a safety net meets the language that runs the web, whether you like it or not. Here's our take.

TypeScript

Nice Pick

JavaScript with a safety net. Because runtime errors are for amateurs.

Pros

• Static typing catches bugs early, saving hours of debugging
• Excellent IDE support with autocompletion and refactoring tools
• Gradual adoption allows mixing with plain JavaScript
• Strong community and regular updates from Microsoft

Cons

• Adds compilation step, slowing down development workflow
• Type definitions can become verbose and complex in large projects

JavaScript

The language that runs the web, whether you like it or not. It's everywhere, and it's not going anywhere.

Pros

• Runs natively in browsers, making it essential for front-end web development
• Huge ecosystem with npm and frameworks like React and Node.js
• Flexible and forgiving syntax for quick prototyping

Cons

• Type coercion and quirks can lead to subtle bugs
• Performance can be inconsistent across different engines

The Verdict

Use TypeScript if: You want static typing catches bugs early, saving hours of debugging and can live with adds compilation step, slowing down development workflow.

Use JavaScript if: You prioritize runs natively in browsers, making it essential for front-end web development over what TypeScript offers.

The Bottom Line

TypeScript wins

JavaScript with a safety net. Because runtime errors are for amateurs.